The top-level model has the biggest box which displays the card itself behind the plastic window under the cover. No AA, no anisotropy: And what I want to say is that the boxes are finally deprived of monsters! In this test the shader speed makes a greater effect, that its why its crippled memory bus doesn’t affect so much, and the card runs faster than its predecessor PRO. All the cards tested have excellent built quality! Let’s compare it to the driver The companies even resort to overclocking and promote overclocked solutions as completely new the marketers at both companies must have huge wages.

Uploader: Mooguzshura
Date Added: 20 April 2013
File Size: 45.77 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 34078
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

ASUS Radeon A9200 SE/T graphics card – Radeon 9200 SE – 128 MB Series

Benchmarking in paris1c Test results: Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus. Taking into account ASUS’ facilities and potential, the deliveries to other companies could fell down as it’s impossible to increase the volumes with TSMC that fast.

The SE easily wins the battle, while the SE has no chance to win here. The SE easily wins over the FX 64bit. The quality on examples 1 and 2 is flawless. Andrey Vorobiev anvakams ixbt. There’s no per-pixel comparison as you won’t notice difference in quality if it touches just several pixels. The ANISO 8x Quality mode provided the real maximum quality with both trilinear filtering and anisotropy working to their full capacity.


But it’s a nice decration as the sink is logo-shaped. But remember that we used the overclocked NV35 as the NV38, and we don’t have yet the final driver version 5x. 9200es a comment below.

ASE/TD/M | Graphics Cards | ASUS Global

Angel of Darkness v. The card is failure protected radeeon the VPU Recover returns the default settings if the card starts working unstably. The FX is also beaten that is why the price will decide a lot. This card is limited by the memory bus, that is why it doesn’t increase the scores compared to the PRO.

ASUS ATI Radeon 9200 SE (A9200SE/T/128M) 128MB DDR SDRAM AGP 4x/8x Graphics adapter

The SE loses to the more expensive FX the memory asks is only 64 bits and loses a little to the FX the narrow memory bus makes a fatal effect. The companies even resort to overclocking and promote overclocked solutions as completely new the marketers at both companies must have huge wages.

The XT goes on a par with its counterpart. The new race has started.


Part 1 – Game tests in 3DMark, and Soft! Also, the fans are equipped with tachometers as the card supports hardware monitoring. Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Maybe there are some other reasons. Both fans have a single power supply source.

I never saw an FX with a bit bus. But only its core clock is lifted.

It might compete only against the FX Ultra. Eadeon ATI 16x Quality showed sharper images due to the 16th degree but on some surfaces the filtering quality was lower. As it was manufactured before the agreement ws concluded, that card sold as a noname card. Let’s compare it to the driver This panel appears only on the reference card; when we installed the same drivers on the ASUS card that tab disappeared. The SmartShader effects will be examined next time.

It’s not the first agreement between this companies. The SE still wins the battle.